data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6148e/6148eefb751ea962c7f65a12cfd50bed4b0a2f8a" alt="cytomic the glue vs waves ssl"
Cytomic The Glue VST has got sidechain filter that affects. It is intended to be a CPU efficient for working professionally. This plug-in is cross platform in VST, RTAS and AU formats. This application aims to follow original E and G Series bus compressors of SSL. Cytomic The Glue VST has got a very impressive and fully scalable user interface.
Cytomic The Glue Vs Waves Ssl Mac Cytomic The
Download it for Mac Cytomic The Glue Crack. Cytomic The Glue VST Crack (Win) Download. The Glue is an analog modeled compressor plug-in. Cytomic's The Glue In this article we will be looking at Waves SSL Comp and Cytomic's The Glue, which fall under the top 20 most used plugins on splice.com2.1 Win Osx-v.r Torrent > DOWNLOAD (Mirror 1) Cytomic - The Glue 1.2.1 VST. And im also fasicnated with pro audio marketing and consumer hype on this mystic topic.Plugin Shootout Waves SSL Comp vs. Someone in one of those facebook groups about music prodcution mentioned how crappy waves ssl is compared to branworx so with an open mind i decided to try it out since ive always used waves ssl just cuz i got it once it came out.
Cytomic The Glue VST Overview. It is full offline installer standalone setup of Cytomic The Glue VST. But without this setting it was very difficult to say which one was better than the other one.Cytomic The Glue VST Free Download Latest Version for Windows. The only difference is that the branworx emulation has a small botton for harmonic enhancement which can be replicated on the waves ssl with placing any daw distortion on low settings afterwards. As Cytomics The Glue and Waves SSL 4000 G Bus Compressor plug-ins.I really didnt find any noticeable difference among them. Even SSLs own stereo rack-mount version costing thousands more overlooks what is.
There was one video made by waves which has since been removed but it was around when waves came out with the ssl plugin, it was like $600 back then or so, It was a video showing a profesional engineer (famous but cant remeber the name) who mixed the same rock song with a real ssl g series and then mix it again completly ITB using the waves ssl and the final comparison was identical. Around 2004 it was a huge debate about plugins vs hardware and it was very hard for engineers to admit plugins where as good or can get as good of results in a mix for profesional deliveries. Neve preamp clones, SSl compressor emution etc etc.
I like the separated view where its easy to see how much ompression or a graphic eq and so on. I didnt like the channel strips from those software. Sometimes its just ease of use, compresor is a tool that will be used a lot so something that brings in faster workflow sometimes helps. So i think the best recomendation is to just download the demos, listen without any sort of marketing hype, try to do blind tests and see for yourself what you like. With plugins mic preamps is still a new frontier but compressor and eq not so much. For some reason people believe a neve preamps from the 70s thats $3000+ will sound way better than anything else and no way it can be replicated.
The slate digital eq was nice, it had the vibe and colouration of the uad, but without the saturation getting too noticeable.I use the waves all the time- my real go to. The newer uad is different however, have not tried it but heard it’s good. Curious about the bx versions.I found the older uad version to be grainier and had a vibe, but was not hi fi sounding. Never cruised on a real console however.I’ve tried the uad and slate digital. I can attest to the fact that the Brits got it right on the eq curves, the comp and expander/gate section.
I wish there was an emulation of the brown knob and the pultec ‘orange’ knob strips, as well as the stereo strips which had a stereo widener near the pan knob.Waves modelled the ‘snap’ on the gates right, it’s perfect and useful, so happy for that. Also the nuance between the E and G has made me develop strategies for how best to deploy each one. That has become an indispensable tool. The G channel has really grown on me, especially the filter to the comp sidechain.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49446/49446323bced50f66ceb909a715ce3579942e345" alt="cytomic the glue vs waves ssl cytomic the glue vs waves ssl"
Still, I think they are worthy purchases for those that like working with channel strips and from a reputable company like brainworx, I don't think you have to worry too much about snake oil. But then again the jury is out as to whether any of these SSL strips sound exactly like their hardware counter parts. They both have analog emulations so the vibe is still there, just not exact recreations of hardware. I only have the waves and NI emulations and have found that more and more I like working with eqs that have more flexible and detailed editing such as the Izotope eq and Melda's free Mequalizer. If you clearly hear the plugin working then your likely pushing it too hard and need to dial it back, which is what I do- push it til I hear it and then dial it back, but I'm sure you know that. Good mixing is about subtleties so it can be hard to hear the difference a plugin is making as it's all about the sum of the parts in your mix adding up.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6148e/6148eefb751ea962c7f65a12cfd50bed4b0a2f8a" alt="cytomic the glue vs waves ssl"